Dewandaru

7 03 2019
Dewandaru

Buah Dewandaru bewarna oranye kemerahan dan bisa dimanfaatkan untuk selai dan jus.

Dewandaru memiliki nama ilmiah Eugenia uniflora L., pohon ini memiliki banyak nama sesuai daerahnya, seperti asem selong, belimbing londo, ceremai londo, cerme belandda atau cereme asam. Dewandaru ini adalah tumbuhan perdu yang memiliki tinggi mencapai 5 meter. Dewandaru merupakan tumbuhan buah yang tergolong family Myrtaceae.

Buah dewandaru berbentuk bulat dengan tekstur menonjol di sekelilingnya. Buahnya berdiameter sekitar 1,5 -3cm. Warna buah ini bisa berubah secara bertingkat dari hijau ketika masih muda, menjadi kuning, orange dan merah saat buah ini matang. Buah ini dapat dimakan langsung atau dibuat jus buah ataupun sebagai selai. Rasa dari buah ini adalah masam segar, sehingga banyak digunakan juga untuk rujak atau diolah menjadi asinan dan manisan seperti ceremai pada umumnya.

Biji dari buah ini kecil, keras dan berwarna coklat keputihan.

Dewandaru

Pohon Dewandaru dengan buah lebat yang tumbuh di pekarangan.

Khasiat dan Manfaat Dewandaru

Khasiat buah Dewandaru yang dilansir dari situs https://bibitbunga.com/manfaat-si-mungil-buah-dewandaru/ ternyata sangat banyak. Buah dewandru memiliki banyak senyawa yang baik bagi tubuh. Salah satu kandungan tersebut adalah senyawa flavonoid dan fenolik. Ada juga kandungan monoterpenes, beta-pinene, trans-beta-ocimene, cisocimene, dan selina-1,3,7(11)-trien-8-one.

Berikut manfaat dewandaru yang dari situs https://bibitbunga.com/manfaat-si-mungil-buah-dewandaru/:

1. Penangkal radikal bebas

Buah dewandaru mampu mencegah kerusakan oksidatif dari proses radikal bebas. Kerusakan oksidatif ini sulit diatasi oleh antioksidan lain dalam tubuh manusia. Selain untuk mencegah radikal bebas, buah dewandru juga memiliki khasiat yang baik untuk mencegah pertumbuhan sel kanker dan sel tumor.

Seperti yang telah dijelaskan sebelumnya, buah dewandru memiliki kemampuan sebagai antioksidan. Hal tersebut karena buah dewandru mengandung senyawa karotenoid yang bertindak sebagai antioksidan dalam tubuh. Ternyata tidak hanya buahnya saja, senyawa karotenoid pun terkandung di dalam daunnya.

2. Antibakteri

Sifat antibakteri yang terkandung dalam biji buahnya memiliki manfaat untuk mengobati penyakit pencernaan, terutama diare. Menurut sebuah penelitian, kandungan protein dalam biji buah dewandaru bermanfaat sebagai antikuman yang dapat menghambat pertumbuhan kuman dalam perut, terutama kuman penyebab diare.

3. Pereda sakit

Khasiat lain dari buah dewandru yang belum banyak diketahui orang adalah sebagai pereda rasa sakit. Daun tanaman dewandru mengandung minyak atsiri yang dapat digunakan sebagai penghilang rasa sakit, seperti nyeri rematik dan nyeri sendi.

4.Mengobati hipertensi

Daun dan buah dewandru dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai herbal untuk menurunkan tekanan darah tinggi dan menurunkan kadar kolesterol dalam tubuh.

5. Mencegah kanker

Manfaat lain yang didapatkan dari buah dewandaru ini adalah sebagai pencegah kanker. Buah ini dipercaya mampu mencegah pertumbuhan sel kanker yang keberadaannya sangat mengancam keberlangsungan hidup manusia.

6. Kayu dewandaru sebagai bahan kerajinan tangan

Selain buah dan daunnya, ternyata bagian kayu dari tanaman ini sering juga dijadikan aksesoris, seperti gelang, kalung, cincin, dan tasbih. Aksesoris tersebut biasanya dijual oleh para pengrajin di tempat-tempat wisata sebagai oleh-oleh.

 

Dewandaru

Dewandaru bisa dimakan segar dan bisa juga diolah menjadi selai. Sumber: ://bibitbunga.com/manfaat-si-mungil-buah-dewandaru

 


FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsAppLineWordPressMendeleyShare


Call for Abstract IALE 2019

28 12 2018
Call for Abstract IALE 2019

Call for Abstract IALE 2019

Call for Abstract IALE 2019 

 

Dear Colleges,

 

We would like to remind you about the invitation to join our symposia in IALE 2019 World Congress July 1-5 2019; Milano, Italy

 

Submit your abstract to:

http://www.iale2019.unimib.it/program/abstracts-submission/

And choose our symposia entitled Biocultural Landscape Code: SYMP74.

 

Symposium Abstract

This symposium is designed to convene researchers and graduate students in landscape ecology, conservation biology, ecology, natural resource management and environmental education and communication, to stimulate fruitful discussions on the current trend of ecosystem service degradation of biocultural landscapes in the world. Current challenges, linked to the anthropic pressure or to climate change (as examples), will be discussed and papers can give insights in addressing such challenges. Emphasis will be on the exploration of the underlying ecological processes affected by anthropogenic activities that are driving ecosystem and landscape patterns in a given area. Research presented at this session may consider plant and animal species diversity, forests, shrub communities, grasslands and wetlands. These may involve field measurements, observation, experiments, modeling, and environmental education and communication within the context of the biocultural landscape in the era of the Anthropocene. The symposium will be a great venue to develop future cooperation among researchers and graduate students working on biocultural landscapes

 

Keywords: biocultural landscape, ecosystem disturbances, environmental education

 

Abstract submission deadline is extended 1 month

January 25th, 2019

February 25th, 2019

 

 

Please take this opportunity to submit your abstract in our SYMP74: Biocultural Landscape.

Share this information for those who are interested to join.

 

See you on July 1-5 2019 at Milano, Italy.

 

Sincerely,

Symposia Organizers SYMP74

RL Kaswanto (IPB University, Indonesia)

Buot Inocencio Jr. (UP Los Banos, Philippines)




Agroekowisata Gambut Misik

26 11 2018
Agroekowisata Gambut Misik

Agroekowisata Gambut Misik

Pengertian Agroekowisata

Kegiatan berwisata atau bepergian ke tempat yang tidak biasa, dengan tujuan untuk berekreasi atau mengisi waktu senggang lainnya, secara lestari dan berkelanjutan untuk menikmati, menghargai dan mempelajari alam, lingkungan dan budaya pertanian dari hulu hingga hilir.

 

Kegiatan Agroekowisata Gambut Misik

  1. Mengelola obyek AEW secara komersial dalam bentuk usaha bersama masyarakat

Ciri obyek agrowisata:

–Kegiatan menerus sepanjang tahun

–Atraktif (menarik)

–Bisa memberikan pengalaman atau proses belajar dengan cara pengunjung terlibat  kegiatan atau melalui progam interpretasi

  1. Menjual produk pertanian segar (sayuran, susu, ikan, daging, telur)
  2. Menjual produk olahan
  3. Menjual tiket atraksi budidaya pertanian termasuk menikmati hasilnya (meminum jamu, jamuan makan, atraksi memberi makan ikan, memancing dll)
  4. Menjual sarana produksi pertanian (pupuk organik yang dihasilkan dari kebun, bibit atau benih)
  1. Menyediakan jasa penginapan (akomodasi), sarapan pagi dan menyediakan konsumsi (makan)

–Bersih dan sehat

–Bentuk yang alami (eco-lodge): rumah panggung dll

–Menyediakan wisata kuliner

  1. Menyediakan jasa transportasi (sekaligus atraksi dengan alat transportasi tradisional seperti andong dll)
  2. Menjadi pemandu wisata
  3. Menjual jasa paket wisata khusus (paket kunjungan khusus, paket pesta ulang tahun, paket pelajar dan mahasiswa, paket mengisi liburan sambil berpetualang di alam,outbond dll)
  4. Jasa atraksi penunjang (pentas seni dll)
  1. Menjual souvenir atau kenangan-kenangan
  • Paket hasil pertanian segar
  • Paket produk olahan (permen jahe, manisan pala, permen susu dll)
  • Kerajinan tangan (sejauh mungkin terkait dengan hasil pertanian setempat: awetan acar dalam botol hias, anyaman,
  • Video, foto dan sebagainya tentang kegiatan atraksi budaya dan pertanian

 

Buku Saku Seri Pengembangan Desa

Buku Seri 01 Revitalisasi Praktik Agroforestri di Perdesaan

Buku Seri 02 Pemanfaatan Pekarangan di Perdesaan

Buku Seri 03 Permukiman Sehat dan Berwawasan Lingkungan

Buku Seri 04 Potensi Agrowisata di Perdesaan

 

Leaflet Pengembangan Desa

Leaflet I Agroforestri

Leaflet II Pekarangan

Leaflet III Permukiman

Leaflet IV Agrowisata




Diskusi Santai Satgas Ciliwung

8 11 2018
Diskusi Santai Satgas Ciliwung

Diskusi Santai Satgas Ciliwung

Diskusi Santai Satgas Ciliwung telah diselenggarakan di kantor Rekam Nusantara Foundation. Lokasinya persis di samping Kantor Kelurahan Sempur. Diskusi dilaksanakan hari Senin 5 November 2018 pukul 15.00 dan diakhir dengan syukuran dan makan malam bersama. Diskusi dihadiri oleh satgas yang telah dibentuk sesuai dengan SK Walikota Bogor No. 660.45-247/2018 tentang Pembentukan Tim Satuan Tugas Naturalisasi Sungai Ciliwung Kota Bogor. Dalam Tim Satgas ini, diketuai langsung oleh Walikota Bogor, dengan wakil I adalah Sekretaris I Asisten Daerah, dan wakil II adalah Sekretaris II Kadis Lingkungan Hidup, serta Sekretaris Kang Een. Dalam Tim Satgas ini juga dilibatkan tim ahli dari berbagai institusi di Kota Bogor.

Diskusi dibuka oleh sekretaris Satgas, Kang Een, sekaligus Ketua Komunitas Peduli Ciliwung (KPC) dengan memberikan gambaran kondisi Sungai Ciliwung saat ini. Kang Een memaparkan hasil survei Satgas Naturalisasi Ciliwung bahwa ada 5.652 rumah masih membuang sampah dan kotoran manusia ke Sungai Ciliwung tersebar di empat kecamatan. Antara lain di Kecamatan Bogor Timur (1.977 rumah), Bogor Tengah (1.491), Bogor Utara (1.878) dan Tanahsareal (306).

Sementara itu, Sekretaris Jen­deral (Sekjen) Wantannas Letjen Doni Monardo menjelaskan, untuk mengerjakan program naturalisasi DAS Ciliwung, pi­haknya tidak bisa berjalan sen­diri. Berkaca pada pengalaman­nya saat menjadi Panglima Komando Daerah Militer III/Siliwangi yang ikut serta dalam program bersih-bersih Sungai Citarum, Jawa Barat, pemerin­tah setempat harus melibatkan berbagai elemen, dari akade­misi, komunitas, pengusaha hingga ulama. “Sebab program besar seperti ini harus ada or­ganisasinya untuk mengelola, harus jelas siapa komandonya dan siapa saja yang terlibat. Organisiasi ini juga harus mem­buat sistem yang dirancang untuk dikerjakan ahlinya,” kata Doni.




Naturalisasi Sungai Ciliwung Kota Bogor

6 11 2018
Naturalisasi Sungai Ciliwung Kota Bogor

Naturalisasi Sungai Ciliwung Kota Bogor

 

Naturalisasi Sungai Ciliwung Kota Bogor mulai menjadi perhatian masyarakat. Kota Bogor kemudian mengambil kebijakan untuk melakukan akselerasi dalam mempercepat proses naturalisasi ini.

Sumber: http://www.beritasatu.com/aktualitas/520765-5000-bangunan-di-kota-bogor-masih-buang-sampah-ke-cilwung.html

Sekjen Wantannas Letjen Doni Monardo memberikan saran berdasarkan pengalamannya membersihkan Sungai Citarum saat menjadi Panglima Komando Daerah Militer III/Siliwangi. Menurutnya, pemerintah harus melibatkan akademisi, pengusaha hingga ulama.

“Program ini harus ada organisasi yang mengelolanya. Harus jelas siapa komandannya dan siapa saja yang terlibat,” kata Doni. Organisasi tersebut selanjutnya diminta membuat sistem yang harus segera dijalankan oleh ahli di bidang terkait.

Terakhir, ia menegaskan program normalisasi Ciliwung harus jelas targetnya mulai dari jangka pendek hingga panjang. “Waktu di Citarum, target hingga enam bulan harus tak ada lagi sampah di permukaan. Itu bisa diterapkan di Ciliwung,” kata Doni.




Kegiatan FKARL 2018

30 10 2018
Kegiatan FKARL 2018

Kegiatan FKARL 2018

Kegiatan FKARL 2018 akan dilaksanakan pada hari Selasa 13 November 2018 pukul 13.00-14.30 WIB. Kegiatan ini akan diselenggarakan di Ruang Sidang Dekanat Faperta IPB. Topik yang diusung adalah Canal District Amsterdam. Materi akan disampaikan oleh Bapak Hasti Tarekat. Beliau adalah founder HERITAGE hands-on.

Informasi mengenai FKARL

FKARL adalah Forum Komunikasi Arsitektur Lanskap yang rutin diselenggarakan oleh Departemen Arsitektur Lanskap Faperta IPB. FKARL hadir sebagai forum untuk saling berbagi mengenai isu terkini yang sedang beredar dan berkembang di masyarakat. FKARL hadir untuk menjembatani diskusi antar stakeholders agar pengalaman dan pembelajaran menjadi modal intangible bagi keilmuan arsitektur lanskap. Siapa pun bisa hadir dalam kegiatan ini, bahkan diencourage untuk hadir agar saling berbagi.




Plants Production of Agroforestry System

26 10 2018

Plants Production of Agroforestry System in Ciliwung Riparian Landscape, Bogor Municipality

YB PrastiyoRL Kaswanto and HS Arifin

Source: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/179/1/012013

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental ScienceVolume 179conference 1

Agroforestry System

Agroforestry System

Abstract

Settlement occupation in Ciliwung riparian zone along Bogor Municipality has reduced vegetation formations of agroforestry, such as kebun campuran (mixed gardens), talun (forest gardens), and pekarangan (home gardens). These processes have reduced plants production, one of riparian landscape services. The purpose of this paper is to know the plant production capacity of agroforestry land use, as a basis for arranging the management of agroforestry landscape in Ciliwung riparian, Bogor Municipality. The study used 14 sample plots (4 taluns, 5 mixed gardens, 5 pekarangans) with purposive sampling method, to plants production analysis of agroforestry land use. Furthermore, the calculation of Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) is conducted to know land productivity. The agroforestry system in Ciliwung riparian, Bogor Municipality has highly potential plant production. The talun has arrange area of 38.77 ha and the average plant production 49.20 Mg/ha, total plant production potency of 1907.48 Mg. The mixed garden has arrange area of 9.44 ha and the average plant production 65.41 Mg/ha, total plant production potency of 617.47 Mg. Meanwhile, the pekarangan has arrange area of 17.53 ha and the average plant production 48.77 Mg/ha, total potential plant production is 854.94 Mg. The talun and mixed garden have high productivity with LER of 1.40 and 1.81, respectively. Where as, the pekarangan has low productivity with LER of 0.96. Agroforestry practices are able to provide better plants production, so that to ensure the stability and sustainability of landowners’ income.

References

  • [1] Gordon M 2004 Stream ecology: an introduction to ecologists ed ke-2 (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons)
  • [2] Mbow C, Van Noordwijk M, Luedeling E, Neufeldt H, Minang PA and Kowero G 2014 Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa Environment sustainable 6 61-67
  • [3] Arifin HS and Nakagoshi N 2011 Landscape ecology and urban biodiversity in tropical Indonesian cities J Landscape and ecological engineering 7 33-43
  • [4] Kaswanto RL, Baihaqi M and Hadi AA 2013 Desain lanskap agroforestri menuju masyarakat rendah karbon Prosiding Forum Komunikasi Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia 2 418-429
  • [5] Mubarok A 2012 (Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor) Karakteristik dan permasalahan pedagang kaki lima (PKL) serta strategi penataan dan pemberdayaannya dalam kaitan dengan pembangunan ekonomi wilayah Kota Bogor Disertasi
  • [6] Susetyo B, Widiatmaka, Arifin HS, Machfud and Nurhayati 2014 Analisis spasial kemampuan dan kesesuaian lahan untuk mendukung model perumusan kebijakan manajemen lanskap di sempadan Ciliwung Kota Bogor Majalah ilmiah Globë 6 51-58
  • [7] Noviandi TUZ, Kaswanto RL and Arifin HS 2017 Riparian landscape management in the midstream of Ciliwung River as supporting Water Sensitive Cities program with priority of productive landscape IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 91 012033
  • [8] Sardjono MA, Djogo T, Arifin HS and Wijayanto N 2003 Klasifikasi dan pola kombinasi komponen agroforestri (Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF))
  • [9] [BPDAS] Balai Pengelolaan DAS Citarum-Ciliwung 2013 Rencana pengelolaan DAS terpadu DAS Ciliwung (Bogor (ID): Departemen Kehutanan)
  • [10] Arifin HS, Sardjono MA, Sundawati L, Djogo T, Wattimena GA and Widianto 2003 Agroforestri di Indonesia bahan latihan (Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF))
  • [11] Republik Indonesia 2011 Peraturan Presiden Nomor 93 Tahun 2011 tentang Kebun Raya(Jakarta)
  • [12] Purnomo DW, Helmanto H and Yudaputra A 2015 Peran Kebun Raya Indonesia dalam upaya konservasi tumbuhan dan penurunan emisi karbon Pros sem nas masy biodiv Indon1 66-70
  • [13] Nyaga J, Barrios E, Muthuri CW, Öborn I, Matiru V and Sinclair FL 2015 Evaluating factors influencing heterogeneity in agroforestry adoption and practices within smallholder farms in Rift Valley, Kenya Agriculture, Ecosystems and environment 212 106-118
  • [14] Martono 2004 (Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro) Pengaruh intensitas hujan dan kemiringan lereng terhadap laju kehilangan tanah pada tanah regosol kelabu Tesis
  • [15] Karyono 1990 Homegardens in Jawa: their structure and function ed K Landauer and M Brazil (Tokyo: United Nations University Press) tropical homegardens
  • [16] Filqisthi TA and Kaswanto RL 2017 Carbon stock and plants biodiversity of pekarangan in Cisadane watershed West Java IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 54 012-024
  • [17] Choliq MBS and Kaswanto RL 2017 Correlation of Carbon Stock and Biodiversity Index at the Small Scale Agroforestry Landscape in Ciliwung Watershed IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environmental Science 91 012007
  • [18] Arifin HS, Wulandari C, Pramukanto Q and Kaswanto RL 2009 Analisis lanskap agroforestri: konsep, metode, dan pengelolaan agroforestri skala lanskap (Indonesia: IPB Press Bogor)

PDF dapat diunduh di Prastiyo_2018_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._179_012013r.




Certificate for Editor the 3rd ISSLD 2017

22 10 2018
Certificate for Editor The 3rd ISSLD 2017 10 Juli 2018

Certificate for Editor the 3rd ISSLD 2017

Certificate for Editor the 3rd ISSLD 2017 is received during my contribution as the chief-editor of the 3rd International Symposium for Sustainable Landscape Development in year 2017. The symposium was organized by Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB). This symposium was held with theme “Urban Resilience”, with the basic idea that more peoples are staying in the urban area which will cause many problems, so therefore we need to anticipate and mitigate this situation.

This certificate for editors are awarded as the appreciation to the contribution of reviewing and editing for articles which were presented during this symposium. We would like to say thank you to our gold sponsor from Ministry of Agriculture, and silver sponsor from BNI46, Sentul City and EPSON. Thank you very much for your kind support which made this symposium became successful and fruitful. And also partnership support from Asosiasi Pendidikan Arsitektur Lanskap Indonesia (APALI) and Ikatan Arsitek Lanskap Indonesia (IALI).

The article will be published on Proceeding IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science of The 3rd International Symposium for Sustainable Landscape Development 2017 (The 3rd ISSLD 2017). In total, there are 43 articles from three sub topic i.e. mitigation, sustainable and resilience.

 




Flinders Street

30 08 2018
Flinders Street

Flinders Street Melbourne

Flinders Street

Flinders Street and Me

EARLY TERMINUS

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flinders_Street_railway_station

The first railway station to occupy the Flinders Street site was called Melbourne Terminus, and was a collection of weatherboard train sheds. It was opened on 12 September 1854 by the Lieutenant-Governor, Charles Hotham. The terminus was the first city railway station in Australia, and the opening day saw the first steam train trip in the country. It travelled to Sandridge (now Port Melbourne), over the now redeveloped Sandridge Bridge, travelling along the now light rail Port Melbourne line.

The first terminus had a single platform 30 metres long, and was located beside the Fish Market building on the south-west corner of Swanston and Flinders Streets.An additional platform was provided in 1877, along with two overhead bridges to provide passenger access, followed by additional timber and corrugated iron buildings and a telegraph station in 1879.The first signal boxes were opened at the station in 1883, one at each end of the platforms. By the 1890s a third island platform had been constructed.

Melbourne’s two other early central-city stations, Spencer Street and Princes Bridge, opened in 1859. Spencer Street served the lines to the west of the city, and was isolated from the eastern side of the network until a ground level railway was built connecting it to Flinders Street in 1879, this track being replaced by the Flinders Street Viaduct in 1889.

Princes Bridge was originally separated from Flinders Street, even though it was only on the opposite side of Swanston Street. Once the railway line was extended under the street in 1865 to join the two, Princes Bridge was closed.It was not reopened until April 1879, and from 1909 slowly became amalgamated into Flinders Street.Federation Square now occupies its site. Up until the 1880s a number of designs for a new station had been prepared, but none ever went any further.
REMARKABLE LANDSCAPE

The iconic of Flinders Street is quickly became a remarkable landscape which is obligated to visit. When you are in Melbourne City (Dont get confuse with Meulaboh City), you have the obligation to visit this landmark. Flinders Street




Riparian Landscape Management

18 08 2018

Riparian Landscape Management in the Midstream of Ciliwung River as Supporting Water Sensitive Cities Program with Priority of Productive Landscape

TUZ NoviandiRL Kaswanto and HS Arifin

Source: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/91/1/012033

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental ScienceVolume 91conference 1

Abstract

Nowadays, Ciliwung River is facing problem of the settlement occupation in its riparian zones. This phenomenon caused ecological damage in riparian, so it can aggravate the disaster of annual flooding in Jakarta. As an effort to control this catastrophe, riparian landscape management of Ciliwung River is needed. Based on its topography, Ciliwung River is divided into three segments, there are the upstream, the midstream, and the downstream. Data shows that riparian in the midstream is the largest area, it covers more than 60% of the total riparian area. This segment is very important to be managed in order to reduce runoff towards the downstream. The method used was comparing many standards to get the ideal riparian width in the midstream, which is 50 m for urban areas and 100 m for outside the urban areas. Next method was analyzing spatially to get riparian landscape characteristic of Ciliwung River. The result showed that 37.11% of riparian zones in the midstream had occupied by settlement. Analysis of riparian function and utilization had held by using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Priority of riparian function in the midstream of Ciliwung River is production. This can be realized with the plan of community garden or inland fisheries. Riparian landscape management in the midstream aims to support the food consumption diversification, and maximize the function of water catchment and water retention in order to support the program of Water Sensitive Cities.

Riparian landscape management

Riparian landscape management

Download free: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/91/1/012033

 Atau unduh di sini Noviandi_2017_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Earth_Environ._Sci._91_012033

References

  • [1]

    Albano R, Sole A, Sdao F, Giosa L, Cantisani A and Pascale S. 2014 A Systemic Approach to Evaluate the Flood Vulnerability for an Urban Study Case in Southern Italy J Water Resource and Protection 6351-362

    Crossref

  • [2]

    Arifasihati Y and Kaswanto 2016 Analysis of Land Use and Cover Changes in Ciliwung and Cisadane Watershed in three Decades Procedia Environmental Sciences 33 465-469

    Crossref

  • [3]

    Arifin HS and Nakagoshi N. 2011 Landscape ecology and urban biodiversity in tropical Indonesian cities J Landscape and Ecological Engineering 7 33-43

    Crossref

  • [4]
    Arroyo AL, Johansen K, Armston J and Phinn S. 2010 Integration of LiDAR and QuickBird imagery for mapping riparian biophysical parameters and land cover types in Australian tropical savannas J Forest and Management 259 598-606
  • [5]

    Barbosa AE, Fernandes JN and David LM 2012 Key Issues for Sustainable Urban Stormwater Management J Water Research 46 6787-6798

    Crossref

  • [6]

    Bertoldi W, Drake NA and Gurnell AM 2011 Interactions between river flows andcolonizing vegetation on a braided river: exploring spatial and temporal dynamics in riparian vegetation cover using satellite data J Earth Surf. Process. Land. 36 1474-1486

    Crossref

  • [7]
    Bertulli JA 1981 Influence of forested wetland on a southern Ontario Watershed Proceeding of The Ontario Wetlands Conference 33-47
  • [8]
    [BPDAS] Balai Pengelolaan DAS Citarum-Ciliwung 2013 (Bogor (ID): Departemen Kehutanan) Rencana Pengelolaan DAS Terpadu DAS Ciliwung
  • [9]

    Castelle AJ, Johnson AW and Conolly C. 1994 Wetlands and stream buffer size requirements [review] J Environmental Quality 23 878-882

    Crossref

  • [10]

    Clerici N, Paracchini ML and Maes J. 2014 Land-cover change dynamics and insights into ecosystem services in European stream riparian zones J Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 14 107-120

    Crossref

  • [11]
    Divelbiss CF 1994 A Review of Selected Functions of Riparian Buffer Zones and Widths Associated With Them In Rivers Without Boundaries Conference, American Rivers Management Society, (April 1994) 1-7
  • [12]

    Helfield J, Engström J, Michel J, Nilsson C and Jansson R. 2012 Effects of river restoration on riparian biodiversity in secondary channels of the Pite River, Sweden J Environ. Manage. 49 130-141

    Crossref

  • [13]

    Li S, Gu S, Tan X and Zhang Q. 2009 Water quality in the upper Han River basin, China: the impacts of land use/land cover in riparian buffer zone J Hazard. Mater. 165 317-324

    Crossref

  • [14]

    Lynch JA and Corbett ES 1990 Evaluation of best management practices for controlling nonpoint pollution from silvicultural operations J The American Water Resources Association 26 41-52

    Crossref

  • [15]

    Kaswanto 2015 Land Suitability for Agrotourism Through Agriculture, Tourism, Beautification and Amenity (ATBA) Method Procedia Environmental Sciences 24 35-38

    Crossref

  • [16]

    Kaswanto and Utami FNH 2016 The Disparity of Watershed Development between Northern and Southern Region of Java Island Procedia Environmental Sciences 33 21-26

    Crossref

  • [17]
    Maryono A. 2009 Kajian lebar sempadan sungai: studi kasus sungai-sungai di provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta J Dinamika Teknik Sipil 9 56-66
  • [18]
    Maryono A. 2014 Menangani Banjir, Kekeringan, dan Lingkungan (Yogyakarta (ID): Gadjah Mada University Press)
  • [19]
    [MONASH UNIVERSITY]. 2016. What is a Water Sensitive City. Publising. http://www.waterforliveability.org.au/?page_id=1706. Accessed 30 October 2016
  • [20]
    Naiman RJ, Decamps H and McClain M. 2005 (Academic Press) Riparia – Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities 448 ISBN: 9780126633153
  • [21]

    Saaty TL 2008 Decision Making with The Analytic Hierarchy Process Int J Services Sciences 1 83-98

    Crossref

  • [22]

    Sliva L and Williams DD 2001 Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality J Water Res. 35 3462-3472

    Crossref

  • [23]

    Stella JC, Rodríguez-González PM, Dufour S and Bendix J. 2013 Riparian vegetation research in Mediterranean-climate regions: common patterns, ecological processes, and considerations for management J Hydrobiologia 719 291-315

    Crossref

  • [24]

    Stevaux JC, Corradini FA and Aquino S. 2012 Connectivity processes and riparian vegetation of the upper Paraná River, Brazil J South American Earth Sciences 46 113-121

    Crossref

  • [25]
    Wong, T. 2015. Water Sensitive Cities: a road map for cities adaptation to climate and population pressures on urban water. Publishing. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/293691/msi-seminar_10-05-25_cwsc_presentation.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2016
  • [26]

    Xia J, Zhai X, Zeng S and Zhang Y. 2014 Systematic solutions and modeling on eco-water and its allocation applied to urban river restoration: case study in Beijing, China J Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 14 39-54

    Crossref